Havana Docks Corp. sued Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings — the parent of Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises and Regent Seven Seas Cruises — under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, known as the Libertad Act. The plaintiff, a US national, had a claim to the terminal, which was nationalized by Cuba after the revolution.
Terminal leasehold expired prior to NCLH calls
However, that claim expired in 2004, years before NCLH ships began calling at the terminal in 2017. In her ruling, Judge Beth Bloom of the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida used the same reasoning she had in earlier dismissing Havana Docks’ suit with MSC Cruises SA and MSC Cruises USA.
Bloom’s decision was with prejudice, meaning the plaintiff can’t file another suit based on the same grounds.
It’s likely defendants in the remaining two cases involving Havana Docks — Carnival Corp. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. — will file motions to dismiss using similar arguments as did Bloom, according to John Kavulich, president of the New York-based US-Cuba Trade and Economic Council.
Decisions can be appealed
Any unsuccessful party can appeal the decision, which Kavulich said would go to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, based in Atlanta, Georgia, to be heard by three justices.